Monday, December 18, 2006
No creo en unicos
My apoligies in advance to those who don't read Spanish but I ran across this very good, but too long to translate right now, article on Chavez's idea of creating a single party. The author, a long time pro-Chavez Venezuelan blogger, expresses skepticism over Chavez's idea of setting up a single party:
Please do check out the full article and comments at the blog. The Luigino who runs the Lubrio blog and is of Aporrea fame, also chimes in with concern over this.
Yet he said something that many of us can agree with, even those of us who are skeptical of this move. Chavez is going to do it, and he certainly has earned the right to do it. More importantly if there is anything this blogger has learned over the past eight years it is to not second guess Chavez. The man truly does know what he is doing. I can think of any number of situations where I thought what he was doing was either wrong or simply made no sense, yet time and again they, with time, proved to be brilliant moves. So we owe it to him to wait and see what comes of it before becoming too skeptical. So as Luigino says; bueno, veremos qué pasa.
|
Antes que nada comparto toooodo lo dicho por el presidente Chávez en el acto de reconocimiento a la base que trabajo (bárbaramente) para la reelección del presidente, pasando por encima de la burocracia estupida creada intencionalmente por jalamecates y negociantes de oficio.
El MVR, el PPT entre otros se convirtieron en tutores malintencionados de la gente que sigue al presidente, es mas se han convertido en alcabalas matraqueadoras de la voluntad de la base, todos lamentablemente nombrados “digitalmente” por el mismo presidente, cosa que siempre he criticado de frente y que ha derivado en errores garrafales como candidatear a levantamanos en la Asamblea o Alcaldes piratas o gobernadores que se las echan al hombro.
Entiendo el malestar del presidente cuando dice que en verdad esos votos alcanzados el 3D no son de sigla alguna, son del pueblo mismo…es mas yo le agregaría que no son de gestiones locales-regionales algunas (contados casos), son de la gente.
Pero eso justifica la creación de un partido? es ahí cuando digo que no comparto eso….la cosa no es de crear o construir partidos, eso es cambiar de siglas nada mas, pero no cambiar mas alla de militar de uno a otro partido.
Yo no estaría en ese partido si se repite la decisión digital de poner a un Ameliach, a un Cabello, a un bolsa como Castelar, a lideres de papel en la “dirección” de un movimiento que solo lideriza Chavez y los demás andan viendo como se montan en dicho autobús, me parece genial que ese caso Chávez le de la espalda a esta gente que quiere cobrar algo que no han hecho.
Pero para que uds entiendan porque no creo en partidos únicos (sino en la diversidad que va mas allá de siglas o colores) les dejo lo escrito por el Profesor Rigoberto Lanz hace unos meses…..disculpen el copy/paste
Please do check out the full article and comments at the blog. The Luigino who runs the Lubrio blog and is of Aporrea fame, also chimes in with concern over this.
Yet he said something that many of us can agree with, even those of us who are skeptical of this move. Chavez is going to do it, and he certainly has earned the right to do it. More importantly if there is anything this blogger has learned over the past eight years it is to not second guess Chavez. The man truly does know what he is doing. I can think of any number of situations where I thought what he was doing was either wrong or simply made no sense, yet time and again they, with time, proved to be brilliant moves. So we owe it to him to wait and see what comes of it before becoming too skeptical. So as Luigino says; bueno, veremos qué pasa.
|
