Monday, April 23, 2007
The not so serious side of the RCTV case
The days are counting down to when the opposition TV network Radio Caracas Television (RCTV) loses its broadcast license and goes off the air. At the end of May its 20 year concession ends and the government has already announced it won't be renewed.
Some in the opposition, and RCTV itself, have tried to make hay of this - that it somehow constitutes a crackdown on freedom of speech or punishment for an anti-government editorial line. And some in the international arena with little knowledge of what has taken place in Venezuela over the past 5 or 6 years have bought into this.
The reality though is that no informed and serious person can make such arguements. They simply have no merrit.
Yet they still may be believed by some in the international community because they have little or no experience with the Venezuelan media. When told that RCTV has been highly partial, or extremely anti-Chavez, or has been outright subversive they think in terms of what they are familiar with.
"Oh, so it is like Fox news" many probably think. They simply can't concieve of what RCTV is like and how it has conducted itself over the past few years.
Of course, RCTV is nothing like Fox. To say RCTV is like Fox is to insult the Fox network. Fox may be right-wing media but RCTV doesn't limit itself to being part of the media. It is part of the opposition intent on getting Chavez out of office by any means. And that is what strikes to the heart of the matter. RCTV is not losing its license for a certain editorial line, or supporting the Venezuelan opposition, or even for reporting on the coup and oil strike.
It is losing license because it was an active participant in the April 2002 against Chavez. And no, its not just that it was in favor of the coup, cheering from the sideline, or even giving it favourable coverage. It actively PARTICIPATED in the coup. Its studios and its broadcasts were used by rebellious military officers to actually direct the coup - giving orders to some, calling on others to surrender.
Watch the first 10 minutes of this video and you will see a TV station that is not reporting news but taking the lead in an insurrection:
Some in the opposition, and RCTV itself, have tried to make hay of this - that it somehow constitutes a crackdown on freedom of speech or punishment for an anti-government editorial line. And some in the international arena with little knowledge of what has taken place in Venezuela over the past 5 or 6 years have bought into this.
The reality though is that no informed and serious person can make such arguements. They simply have no merrit.
Yet they still may be believed by some in the international community because they have little or no experience with the Venezuelan media. When told that RCTV has been highly partial, or extremely anti-Chavez, or has been outright subversive they think in terms of what they are familiar with.
"Oh, so it is like Fox news" many probably think. They simply can't concieve of what RCTV is like and how it has conducted itself over the past few years.
Of course, RCTV is nothing like Fox. To say RCTV is like Fox is to insult the Fox network. Fox may be right-wing media but RCTV doesn't limit itself to being part of the media. It is part of the opposition intent on getting Chavez out of office by any means. And that is what strikes to the heart of the matter. RCTV is not losing its license for a certain editorial line, or supporting the Venezuelan opposition, or even for reporting on the coup and oil strike.
It is losing license because it was an active participant in the April 2002 against Chavez. And no, its not just that it was in favor of the coup, cheering from the sideline, or even giving it favourable coverage. It actively PARTICIPATED in the coup. Its studios and its broadcasts were used by rebellious military officers to actually direct the coup - giving orders to some, calling on others to surrender.
Watch the first 10 minutes of this video and you will see a TV station that is not reporting news but taking the lead in an insurrection: